More on Blankfein and Same-Sex Marriage

English: Logo of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc....

Knowledge @ Wharton wrote a follow-up post to the New York Times article I was quoted in regarding Blankfein’s new role as spokesman for same-sex marriage. Some excerpts are below and you can find the full article here

“I’m Lloyd Blankfein … and I support marriage equality.” Those are the words used by the chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs in a new video spot produced by The Human Rights Campaign, a national organization that advocates equal rights for gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgendered people.

Blankfein is not the most obvious spokesperson for such a campaign. As an article in The New York Times points out, he has been “a lightning rod for Wall Street critics” taking aim at exorbitant executive pay packages and the role Goldman Sachs and other investment banks played leading up to the financial crisis.

Given that context, the video seems less like a publicity stunt and more like an authentic statement. Yet many observers are wondering what effect Blankfein’s participation in the series could have on his public-relations embattled firm. Some — like Paul A. Argenti, a professor at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth who was interviewed for the Times article — predict there will be very little impact beyond a boost to those Goldman employees who identify personally with the issue of marriage equality. For the wider public, though, it’s a simple mismatch between the spokesperson and the issue at hand. “If Mr. Blankfein was taking a radical stand on pay you could say wow, that’s big. But equality is simply not an issue you associate with Goldman.”

But others say that Blankfein’s participation in the video series could ultimately have a positive ripple effect for the firm. Through the media and other “social processes, people develop categories about what characteristics are most representative of a given group or entity,” Wharton management professor Jennifer Mueller notes. “Prior to [the financial crisis], people most certainly associated Goldman with words like ‘brilliant,’ ‘leader’ and ‘conservative.’ But post 2008, they may have also built negative associations with Goldman, including ‘self-interest,’ ‘duplicity’ and a general disregard for social welfare.”

Read the rest of the article at Knowledge @ Wharton.

 

Tags: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: